Miley Cyrus Naked Pics by Annie Leibovitz for Vanity Fair

• Forums > CELEBRITY GOSSIP > Miley Cyrus Naked Pics by Annie Leibovitz for Vanity Fair
• New Topic    Reply

Angie Calgary Age: 23 Posts: 4736	More naked pics of celebrity whores on the go. I'm not sure how many of you are familiar with the most obnoxious face in Hollywood - Miley Cyrus, but she's a 15 years old whore that was created by Disney mass production as their cash cow. Miley Cyrus has been whoring herself big time, I just don't talk about her much, because her mouth is more annoying than the second most obnoxious Hollywood celebrity - Angelina Jolie (in case you were wandering, third most obnoxious celebrity mug belongs to Jennifer Aniston - ewww). Miley Cirus' upper lip lifts up when she speaks or laughs making her obnoxious face look like Butt-Head from Beavis and Butt-Head, revealing all of her upper gums, it's fucking gross. This is a pic of Beavis and Butt-Head (Butt-Head on the left) And a pic of Miley Cyrus with her upper gums revealed the Butt-Head style Anyway, so our 15 years old Disney whore Miley Cyrus could not get enough of her obnoxious self and stripped down naked for the lens of most overrated photographer of all time - Annie Leibovitz who has been utilizing her crappy photography skills to do pictures for some of the top ranked magazines, such as Vanity Fair, the magazine that paid top bucks to get the 15 year old whore Miley Cyrus to strip down naked and just cover her underage nipples so they have something to put on their pages. Pedophiles from all over the world are guaranteed to purchase this issue of Vanity Fair and there's fair number of them out there (ever been on MySpace?) so it's gonna sell well. Too bad Miley Cyrus ain't showing no tits. Pedos are just gonna have to wank off to the pics of her naked back. Miley Cyrus said that these naked pictures were meant to be "artistic". Artistic my ass, you whore. You are just whoring yourself cause you don't know where to stop. You’re 15 years old and you're topless, barely covering your underage nipples and titties. Don't feed me with that "artistic" bullshit... Anyway, the rest of her statement says that the pictures were meant to be "artistic" but now she feel embarrassed and wanted to apologize to her fans for going naked for Annie Leibovitz and Vanity Fair. What a pile of bullshit. She could not resist the fat check she got from Vanity Fair is all. Another fact proving that Miley Cyrus is full of shit is an interview the whore held with Bruce Handy to whom she told that she saw a picture Annie Leibovitz took and liked it: “Annie took, like, a beautiful shot, and I thought it was really cool. That’s what she wanted me to do, and you can’t say no to Annie. I think it’s really artsy. It wasn’t in a skanky way.” The news of Miley Cyrus posing Naked for Vanity Fair has of course reached the ears of Disney executives, who released the statement that it's unfortunate that this situation was created "to deliberately manipulate a 15-year-old in order to sell magazines." That is of course a pile of bullshit too. Miley Cyrus was not manipulated. Vanity Fair confessed to the New York Times that Miley Cyrus' parents were on the photo set at all times, approved of their daughter whoring herself naked for fat checks and saw the pictures taken by a digital camera instantly and approved of their 15 years old whore daughter being portrayed as a whore in the nude. I suppose you have all guessed the same thing I have guessed. All Miley Cyrus wannabies - you know, the girls 13-16 years of age who abuse their parents until they buy them Miley Cyrus CDs are going to take pictures of themselves naked like this and post them on MySpace. The new generation of prostitutes is being formed as we speak. Great job, Miley Cyrus, great fucking job!
	Apr 27, 2008 at 7:19 pm
FergusMaximus Rock the Rebel, Metal the Devil Age: 25 Posts: 1514	She can't help it, it's not her fault she has no soul. Guaranteed she's a test tube baby.
	Apr 27, 2008 at 7:27 pm
Lila Edmonton Age: 26 Posts: 1184	I think we just got used to boo boos each time something that has a relation to sexuality comes across. Brooke Shields appeared naked in The Blue Lagoon back in 1980 when she was only 15 year old. Back then it wasn't a big deal and her entire career took off after that movie. Miley Cyrus didn't even go all naked, just supposedly topless covering all her naughty bits. Something like that would have been nothing in 1980. But it seems a big deal in 2008. Not only three decades forward and any naked skin is considered the end of the world. People need to pull their heads out of their asses. And I'm not saying Angie is in the wrong, cause she's just reflecting what today's society is all about. BTW, I really don't like Miley Cyrus the slight little bit. She's terrible on all counts.
	Apr 27, 2008 at 8:08 pm
pornask Edmonton Age: 27 Posts: 1207	The thing is, that the society is trying to "protect" our youth and any underage nudity in media is a big taboo, but go to the mall on a Summer day or walk down the street - you will see 13 years old dressed in skankier clothes than 2 dollar hookers, revealing far more than Miley Cyrus in this pic. Seriously, little girls wearing tank tops that get only high enough to cover their nipples, their denim jeans dropped so low, you are surprised their pussy crack is not showing... Damn. And that is the youth we need to protect so vehemently.
	Apr 27, 2008 at 8:38 pm
Paulie Edmonton Age: 21 Posts: 2140	If those are the kinds of shots Annie Leibovitz took, and her parents where there at the shoot... go ahead Miley. I think they're honestly quite beautiful. Could be better... but they're not THAT bad. I'll admit, I'm a fan of her music, but it wasn't until recently. Honestly, who cares? She's in a tough industry, and shes lucky to have her father in the position he was already in, and people need to remember she's a person. It's not even 3 years till she's 18, these pictures aren't illegal because she is covered, and she is trying to be a huge star. It won't be long till she breaks from Disney... not with her music on the radio, and it won't be long till no one will really care at all.
	Apr 27, 2008 at 11:34 pm
flora_tink southern US Age: 22 Posts: 2261	ohhh miley =/ i like her. but i am truly disappointed in here. she's way too young. i wonder what her father thinks of this..
	Apr 28, 2008 at 2:45 am
scottmacd37 Halifax Age: 45 Posts: 118	http://www.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idUSN2641449020080428
	Apr 28, 2008 at 3:13 am
flora_tink southern US Age: 22 Posts: 2261	scottmacd37 wrote: http://www.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idUSN2641449020080428 wow really? i just read on cnn a few days ago that it wasn't her showing her green bra, but someone that closely resembles her
	Apr 28, 2008 at 8:51 am
Angie Calgary Age: 23 Posts: 4736	We have more pictures from Miley Cyrus' naked photoshoot with Annie Leibovitz. Some of the pics involve Miley's dad Billy Ray Cyrus and they look like redneck family portraits form Walmart where as a 15 year old daughter is already an experienced prostitute having been with her uncle on his farm since the age of 8 and her daddy being a local drunk who's had every single STD you can name and passed it on to every single, widowed and married woman in the area. Attention whoring works for them quite well, you can tell. from the photoshoot held outdoors with a simple portable background and studio lights. Miley Cyrus is sitting on the stool topless, covering her baby tits with a sheet. That's got to be a wardrobe stylist or some other shit that was helping Miley Cyrus look like a skank Make up crew ensuring the overused skank skin of a teenage star looks like freshly powdered baby ass Daddy Billy Ray Cyrus with his beloved skank Miley Cyrus and a motorbike in the background The little whore Miley Cyrus showing skin Daddy and his little girl. Annie Leibovitz is showing them what their skanky asses look like on a digital camera They could have gone to Walmart to get this show done for $8.95
	Apr 28, 2008 at 9:17 am
Starlite venus Age: 26 Posts: 2578	wow if that was the photoshoot {thats disapointing} so whats the big-deal here again
	Apr 28, 2008 at 9:23 am
Lila Edmonton Age: 26 Posts: 1184	Oh shit. They look like they were shooting pics for the cover of some romantic novel or something. Only it's creepy cause we're talking about a father and a daughter here. Why is Billy Ray Cyrus messing around? He should step right up and offer her up to the highest bidder. This type of whoring is so 80's
	Apr 28, 2008 at 9:23 am
Chocolate Edmonton Age: 24 Posts: 369	Well, when I was 15, I didn't feel like being snuggly, huggly with my dad and definitely didn't feel like posing for pictures between his legs. It's kind of creepy. Though I find the fact that Miley Cyrus is famous far more creepier.
	Apr 28, 2008 at 9:29 am
pothead Fort McMurray Age: 26 Posts: 774	That's Annie Leibovitz for you. Overrated photographer with no imagination and skill. Same ol' grey background, same ol' fan in the (mullet) hair, same ol' dramatic look where as one person stares away from the camera and the other at the lens... Get a life Annie Leibovitz, you are as overrated as they come. Are you trying to keep your name in the game by creating pedo suggestive imagery combined with incestuous type undertones?
	Apr 28, 2008 at 9:35 am
BlackCat Edmonton Age: 25 Posts: 259	Just wait till they release the next batch of pictures form this Vanity Fair photoshoot - Billy Ray Cyrus sucking on Miley Cyrus' toes.
	Apr 28, 2008 at 9:38 am
Killa NYC, NY Age: 27 Posts: 185	"Naked"? So she's showing her back, who cares, its not that serious. And how is creepy for her to be snuggly with he father, hes the reason she has millions in the bank.
	Apr 28, 2008 at 9:53 am
Channy Edmonton Age: 25 Posts: 1307	FergusMaximus wrote: She can't help it, it's not her fault she has no soul. Guaranteed she's a test tube baby. I agree I don't think that anyone that... not quite ugly (... but too young to be pretty....) could come out of billy ray cyrus.
	Apr 28, 2008 at 10:10 am
flora_tink southern US Age: 22 Posts: 2261	wow. that's EXTREMELY creepy idk i refuse to call her a whore or anything else in that nature. i DO believe she is making a GIGANTIC mistake i am still at awe. why was her DAD there?!
	Apr 28, 2008 at 11:18 am
Channy Edmonton Age: 25 Posts: 1307	I don't think she is a whore exactly... but posing nude, half nude or even showing that much skin at 15 is wrong nd her parents shouldn't be condoning it. I think she has the potential to be a star and to be a very pretty woman, but she is going about it in the wrong way.
	Apr 28, 2008 at 11:26 am
Tender Edmonton Age: 27 Posts: 736	I don't think magazines like Vanity Fair should be posting pictures of underage kids taken in such way as to imply nudity. Other than that I don't see much reason to over react. I have done worse things when I was 15. On the other hand, I don't understand what the whole Miley Cyrus hype is all about. I don't particularly find her attractive and her music is definitely not much. The fact that she makes million dollars per week and growing is scary. They say Miley Cyrus will soon be worth a billion dollars. I wander how much they paid her to be naked (as naked as she can go for her age).
	Apr 28, 2008 at 11:37 am
Channy Edmonton Age: 25 Posts: 1307	I agree... i mean... who knows what the future is going to hold for her, but for a 15 year old to be worth that much isn't right. Thats how you end up with the Lindsay Lohans and Britney Spears' of the world.
	Apr 28, 2008 at 11:41 am
Melicious Los Angeles Age: 37 Posts: 1719	Okay. If Vanity Fair and Annie Leboshits take photos of a half naked 15 year old it's "art". If Joe Schmoe down the street takes photos of a half naked 15 year old he's a pervert, has to go to jail and thereafter register as a sex offender. WTF??? And people wonder why the public thinks celebrities get special treatment? Um.... CAUSE THEY DO! lol
	Apr 28, 2008 at 11:45 am
Channy Edmonton Age: 25 Posts: 1307	Was there ever any doubt? i mean most of the population can do at least one thing that a star can do... and yet they get paid millions for what they do when we have to work our asses off just to afford rent... plus there's the whole justice inequality...
	Apr 28, 2008 at 11:57 am
Killa NYC, NY Age: 27 Posts: 185	Channy wrote: Was there ever any doubt? i mean most of the population can do at least one thing that a star can do... and yet they get paid millions for what they do when we have to work our asses off just to afford rent... plus there's the whole justice inequality... Very true, good point
	Apr 28, 2008 at 12:18 pm
flora_tink southern US Age: 22 Posts: 2261	i agree with you channy posing like that. she is 15 years old and i can't believe her parents are fine with it as well as vanity fair doing a photo shoot with a 15 year old like that. it's kind of like child pornography to me. after all, she is still a child. and i agree with you tender, as well. i don't see how people can call her a slut based on what she wears (i was wearing 'worse' at 15) and those pictures of her and that girl taking that candy from her mouth? it's just fucking around, people are so serious.
	Apr 28, 2008 at 1:20 pm
Melicious Los Angeles Age: 37 Posts: 1719	I think this pic is the most "artistic" out of the bunch....lol Introducing the new "Vanity Fair" Miley Doll!
	Apr 28, 2008 at 5:15 pm
Starlite venus Age: 26 Posts: 2578	Melicious wrote: I think this pic is the most "artistic" out of the bunch....lol Introducing the new "Vanity Fair" Miley Doll! -lol-
	Apr 28, 2008 at 5:23 pm
qutelipzx_2 d.c. babi Age: 41 Posts: 1	im dissapointed in her but got damn she made a mistake parents should be mad but it was just this 1 fuckin time jezz leave her alone yeah she may look like a whore in this picture but she may have needed the money u people who are saying things would have probably did the same thng if u was in her place damn she 15 years old she made a mistake.
	Apr 28, 2008 at 9:17 pm
Chocolate Edmonton Age: 24 Posts: 369	qutelipzx_2 wrote: she may have needed the money I don't think that quite happens to be the case. If you read above, Miley Cyrus makes $1 000 000 a week. That's one million dollars every week. That's more than most millionaires make. She makes more in one day that we all make all our lives combined.
	Apr 28, 2008 at 9:20 pm
flora_tink southern US Age: 22 Posts: 2261	i'd still hit that.
	Apr 28, 2008 at 10:05 pm
Angie Calgary Age: 23 Posts: 4736	I'd hit million dollars a week any day. Even if it looks like Butt-Head
	Apr 28, 2008 at 10:14 pm
Starlite venus Age: 26 Posts: 2578	flora_tink wrote: i'd still hit that. me too. {maybe share?-lol-
	Apr 28, 2008 at 10:21 pm
shawnlove USA Age: 121 Posts: 490	Problem is, that everyone is talking about her and that is what they want. Negative or positive = $$$$$$. That is why I stay out of all the shit that happens in the movie or music world. I have boycotted movies and only see what I think I may like on video. I don't buy music I record. The hell with all of them, they get richer and the poor get poorer because of us wanting to keep them in the limelight. This is how all it works.
	Apr 28, 2008 at 10:22 pm
Starlite venus Age: 26 Posts: 2578	it can only help {you watch and she just showing her naked shoulders why the big fuss??
	Apr 28, 2008 at 10:32 pm
shawnlove USA Age: 121 Posts: 490	Starlite wrote: it can only help {you watch and she just showing her naked shoulders why the big fuss?? exactly.....now if we all just simply ignor any and everything that is written about her and all the other so called stars it would go away. The public is what finally makes a person a star because they have to have more of them in their sorry boring lives. While working in the movie industry I worked with big stars that in reality were average people that thought everyone should kiss their feet. Fuck them! I could't stand it although I made some good money, I left it and moved on with my life because I didn't want to be a part of it.
	Apr 28, 2008 at 10:40 pm
flora_tink southern US Age: 22 Posts: 2261	shawnlove wrote: Problem is, that everyone is talking about her and that is what they want. Negative or positive = $$$$$$. That is why I stay out of all the shit that happens in the movie or music world. I have boycotted movies and only see what I think I may like on video. I don't buy music I record. The hell with all of them, they get richer and the poor get poorer because of us wanting to keep them in the limelight. This is how all it works. no i'd still tap that even if she didn't have a lot of money at all =]
	Apr 29, 2008 at 1:29 am
Southerns Porterville, South Africa Age: 42 Posts: 1388	Just curious am I seeing things. Look at the position of the tops strap in this picture and now look at the black line by her thumb, not natural, but a straight black line in the same place as the other tops strap. I think they just wrapped it around her black top, so not really naked underneath.
	Apr 29, 2008 at 1:44 am
flora_tink southern US Age: 22 Posts: 2261	Southerns wrote: Just curious am I seeing things. Look at the position of the tops strap in this picture and now look at the black line by her thumb, not natural, but a straight black line in the same place as the other tops strap. I think they just wrapped it around her black top, so not really naked underneath. ahhh good eye!
	Apr 29, 2008 at 2:17 am
Southerns Porterville, South Africa Age: 42 Posts: 1388	Thanx I tend to notice the details when it comes to the female species.
	Apr 29, 2008 at 4:04 am
Freyr Madrid Age: 33 Posts: 28	Tender wrote: I don't think magazines like Vanity Fair should be posting pictures of underage kids taken in such way as to imply nudity. Other than that I don't see much reason to over react. I have done worse things when I was 15. Agree with that... It's not I specially anything about this, but I don't think it's that terrible. A mistake in my opinion, but nothing else.
	Apr 29, 2008 at 6:11 am
Tender Edmonton Age: 27 Posts: 736	Her hair is all fluffed up so you can't really tell whether it's her top or a strand of hair. However it's not what it is that counts, it's the intent, and the intent was to make an impression that Miley Cyrus is topless. They wanted to make it look like she's wearing a skin. That's what they call implied nudity. Sex sells, underage sells with all the pedophiles. If Annie Leibovitz didn't want to give an impression that Miley Cyrus is naked in these pictures, she would have made it crystal clear that she's wearing the top. But exact opposite is true. Miley may quite likely have kept her top on when these pics were taken, but the intent was to make her look naked. It's the intent that counts, not whether she's wearing anything under the sheet or not.
	Apr 29, 2008 at 8:50 am
flora_tink southern US Age: 22 Posts: 2261	Tender wrote: Her hair is all fluffed up so you can't really tell whether it's her top or a strand of hair. However it's not what it is that counts, it's the intent, and the intent was to make an impression that Miley Cyrus is topless. They wanted to make it look like she's wearing a skin. That's what they call implied nudity. Sex sells, underage sells with all the pedophiles. If Annie Leibovitz didn't want to give an impression that Miley Cyrus is naked in these pictures, she would have made it crystal clear that she's wearing the top. But exact opposite is true. Miley may quite likely have kept her top on when these pics were taken, but the intent was to make her look naked. It's the intent that counts, not whether she's wearing anything under the sheet or not. EXACTLY. if it looks like kiddie porn &it smells like kiddie porn, it's KIDDIE PORN.
	Apr 29, 2008 at 9:00 am
Melicious Los Angeles Age: 37 Posts: 1719	flora_tink wrote: Southerns wrote: Just curious am I seeing things. Look at the position of the tops strap in this picture and now look at the black line by her thumb, not natural, but a straight black line in the same place as the other tops strap. I think they just wrapped it around her black top, so not really naked underneath. ahhh good eye! I think that if it were the strap to her top, they would have said that already as a defense. I'm sure it's just a bit of her hair. I think there are other poses that show that there isn't anything on underneath. It's kiddie porn plain and simple. At theast by the definition that the law states in most of this country.
	Apr 29, 2008 at 11:07 am
Angie Calgary Age: 23 Posts: 4736	Some interesting new details regarding this Vanity Fair photoshoot with naked Miley Cyrus surfaced today. Vanity Fair reps said that Miley Cyrus' and/or minders were present on the set at all times, including the time when naked pictures were taken and agreed to the photos taken. However this is not what Miley Cyrus and Disney claim. Disney rep said that Miley's dad Billy Ray Cyrus was not on the set when those topless pictures were taken. Allegedly he did not see the picture, because he wasn't there so he should not approve of them. They claim Miley Cyrus was "manipulated" into posing nude in order to boost sales of Vanity Fair. Miley Cyrus' grandma and her teacher were allegedly on the set to supervise her and Annie Leibovitz allegedly convinced them that the pictures will be artistic. So they agreed. Parents were not there at the time and allegedly are "mortified" over those naked pics. Picture is of Annie Leibovitz and Billy Ray Cyrus on the set for Vanity Fair
	Apr 29, 2008 at 11:32 am
Melicious Los Angeles Age: 37 Posts: 1719	What did Billy Ray and the wifey decide to amble off and grab a sandwich or something? I don't believe that one for a second....lol. Spin city man.....spin city. They're treading water and doing it at other people's expense. It's Hollywood Scandal 101....lol
	Apr 29, 2008 at 11:44 am
Channy Edmonton Age: 25 Posts: 1307	They need her to make headlines... ANOTHER disney nudie scandal... its perfect
	Apr 29, 2008 at 11:54 am
Angie Calgary Age: 23 Posts: 4736	Billy Ray Cyrus said he had "a prior commitment". Go figure
	Apr 29, 2008 at 11:59 am
flora_tink southern US Age: 22 Posts: 2261	[quote:Angie]but isn't it STILL kiddie porn? even if billy ray cyrus was there? even if he gave his consent? yes, he is a parent, but he's STILL contributing to lots of corrupted minds. the law states that it is kiddie porn, yet, why do THEY get the special treatment? they are us citizens, they know how the laws are. i blame the father AND the government for not doing shit; maybe they will investigate if they have legit evidence (which i think it's pretty legit enough if u asked me!) so NOW i'm wondering if they are going to sue vanity fair or get money off the side so they won't complain >.< this drives me INSANE!
	Apr 29, 2008 at 12:32 pm
Melicious Los Angeles Age: 37 Posts: 1719	Here's another celebrity Dad cashing in on his daughter....not to mention the picture is creepy as hell. Hulk Hogan helps his daughter with some sun tan oil. Ummm.....okay.
	Apr 29, 2008 at 4:51 pm
flora_tink southern US Age: 22 Posts: 2261	Melicious wrote: Here's another celebrity Dad cashing in on his daughter....not to mention the picture is creepy as hell. Hulk Hogan helps his daughter with some sun tan oil. Ummm.....okay. ew. i would NEVER let my father touch me like that; no matter how close he was to me.
	Apr 29, 2008 at 4:53 pm
Viper_N_Kiss BkLyN Age: 38 Posts: 708	I dont really see anything wrong with the photo shoot or miley cyrus because when u think about it, there are other celebrities just a lil bit older than her that dont have concerned parents like billy ray is.. They run around taking real nude pics of there tits and pussy and flashing it for the world to see.. Doing drugs on top of that or getting arrested.. I have seen alot worse, like lindsey lohan, britney spears, and the biggest slut,whore, i find to be paris hilton.. I also dont think miley is any where near being considered a whore when u can actually tell me how u define whore.. Maybe i have a different definition for it and thats involving multiple sex partners.. As strict as billy ray is with giving her an allowance of what she makes and monitoring who she dates i dont see whore in there any where.. Just my opinion anyway..
	Apr 29, 2008 at 5:20 pm

• Forums > CELEBRITY GOSSIP > Miley Cyrus Naked Pics by Annie Leibovitz for Vanity Fair
  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
• New Topic    Reply