Welcome, Guest ! Login

Israel Military Girls - So Sexy (pics)

Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
Angie
Angie
Calgary
Age: 27
Posts: 4774
Well, we all know Israel needs to be nuked the fuck out of this world for their endless aggression against poor Palestinians, but that's not the point. Let's talk about sexy military girls instead. Especially those well known Israel military girls pics of which have been one of the most popular virals in past few years.

I'm assuming you all have probably seen the pics of hot Israel military girls, but there's never enough of sexy on any forum board so here they come. I don't even understand how sexy chicks like that can come out of shitty nation like Israel. Still, world needs to do what's right, rather than what turns it on. Israel needs to be nuked and all those sexy military girls are to go too. Until then, let's drool over this endless hotness



Brunette on the right wrapped in light blue tower is ridiculously hawt




















redhead with freckles (so hot)









Jan 22, 2009 at 9:30 pm 
Starlite
Starlite
venus
Age: 31
Posts: 2639
yummy
Jan 22, 2009 at 9:37 pm 
Scooter
Scooter
MI
Age: 48
Posts: 1153
My favorite things: women with guns
Jan 22, 2009 at 9:40 pm 
Jason
Jason
Virginia/Washington, DC
Age: 39
Posts: 1702
Angie wrote:


Brunette on the right wrapped in light blue tower is ridiculously hawt

[/img]


If I could only pick one, I'd pick the one in the pink towel on the left. Yum!
Jan 22, 2009 at 9:42 pm 
Paulie
Paulie
Edmonton
Age: 25
Posts: 2234
aaand I'm the only one going "OMG Awesome photo" purely because it's a cool shot.


Jan 22, 2009 at 9:48 pm 
Sherry
Sherry
Sin City
Age: 33
Posts: 39
angie, if it wasn't absolute before, it is now. your anti-semitism makes me sick to my gut. I definitely hope karma comes your way someday soon, and your hatred and bigotry comes back to haunt you in too many ways to mention. you're anti-gun yet pro-nuclear weapon. no hypocrisy involved there. here's hoping a smart bomb finds it's way down your chimney then
Jan 23, 2009 at 1:00 am 
Caltaz
Caltaz
USA
Age: 44
Posts: 1208
Endless aggression? I guess we view the coin from two different sides.
Jan 23, 2009 at 7:42 am 
Lila
Lila
Edmonton
Age: 30
Posts: 1205
Being anti hand gun (so people don't walk around with concealed hand guns readily killing others in random) has nothing to do with wanting to sort out the nation that has been occupying land that's not theirs and killing innocent people. That reminds me - a nation that occupies land of others and kills innocent people... Guess I understand where you're coming from!

Here's hoping Middle East joins up against Israel and sends them where they belong.
Jan 23, 2009 at 8:26 am 
Ron3on
Ron3on
Calgary
Age: 31
Posts: 105
Israel locked up Palestine in a cage like a cat and kept poking them and poking them until the cat hissed and scratched back. That was the moment Israel was waiting for so they can punish the cat for being naughty by kicking it with a steel toe boot and hitting with metal rod while still entrapped in that cage. Cat's little kitties were murdered. That's about in brief and simple language what's going on in Gaza strip and why Israel is a bad country and truly needs to be wiped out of there.

Unfortunately nuking Israel won't be that easy cause they have nuclear weapons themselves so those would explode taking surrounding countries with them. Whoever comes up with good idea on how to destroy Israel completely and save surrounding countries should be awarded Nobel Peace Prize.

Israel military girls - while really hot, they are still Israeli. You can find hot chicks in any nation. I'm sure if you went though some military school for girls in any random country, you'd pick up nice few dozen of incredible army hotties in khaki pants.
Jan 23, 2009 at 8:47 am 
ozdude
ozdude
Edmonton
Age: 28
Posts: 373
Paulie wrote:
aaand I'm the only one going "OMG Awesome photo" purely because it's a cool shot.




i love the big eye in the scope kinda makes me laugh
Jan 23, 2009 at 8:58 am 
YellowFrog
YellowFrog
Vegreville
Age: 26
Posts: 311
I'm surprised to see some people still think Israel are good guys. Pro Israel news channels still do a good job keeping people brainwashed it seems.
Jan 23, 2009 at 9:14 am 
Caltaz
Caltaz
USA
Age: 44
Posts: 1208
These are interesting views. It is each ones right to enjoy their own opinion be it historically correct or not. Please do not hear that as a critique but simply a note to self to review the history of Israel in the scope of the world. The historical references in the previous post do not line themselves with the history as my brain recalls it.
Jan 23, 2009 at 9:20 am 
Ron3on
Ron3on
Calgary
Age: 31
Posts: 105
I made a little bit of an allegoric description of the Israel situation, but tell me - which part of what I had said did you not agree with or found incorrect?
Jan 23, 2009 at 9:25 am 
Wannabe
Wannabe
Antarctica
Age: 27
Posts: 312
Excuse me, Ron3on. You did not actually think people who get duped by fake news provided by their fake TVs would have a clue about history or would be willing to learn...

Here's how the face of Israel has changed over the year (it's frightening how strikingly precise you were with your allegoric description of situation in Gaza)



Israel cut off Gaza Strip from the rest of the country year ago and kept it that way. The comparison with a cat in a cage was just perfect. If you get cornered and oppressed like that, there is no wonder you will retaliate.

Europe is a little more educated on the matter and there have been massive anti Israel demonstration throughout the continent lately. Thanks to this unyealding pressure from Europe, Israel was forced into unilateral ceasefire.

To all the jews who feel offended - no disrespect to you, but get a clue and get your country on the leash already. Enough stealing, enough killing, enough of you. Within a span of 20 days Israeli army killed 700 adults and 400 children. Disgusting savages!

TV stations in Europe are airing documentaries about atrocities of Israeli military and it is not pretty. It's one of main reasons why massive demonstrations started all over Europe. Luckily it's starting to pay off but I agree with everyone who's said that - Israel needs to be stopped at all cost. Nuke the fuckers if nothing else stops them.
Jan 23, 2009 at 10:42 am 
LayLow
LayLow
Edmonton
Age: 31
Posts: 1012
Nuke them?? What percentage of women and children would die in comparison to soldiers? Ever heard of the term "Fallout" or do you think the blast of radius of such a weapon is just contained? What good would radiated lands do the people of Palestine? Maybe we should have just given them Chernobyl...

No one on here has the credentials or the authority to make an informed decision on whats going on.
Jan 23, 2009 at 10:54 am 
Tender
Tender
Edmonton
Age: 31
Posts: 736
That's a pretty good idea. Move all Israelis to Chernobyl, or on some desolate island. They can deploy their military there and kill their own children as much as they like if they're so trigger happy.

Nuking the area of course would not work, but as Ron3on had said - anyone who can find the solution to exterminate the Israel and clean the area of them without harming innocent Palestinians deserves the peace prize.

As for having the knowledge or authority I think the map posted by Wannabe speaks for itself.
Jan 23, 2009 at 11:08 am 
Talshadar
Talshadar
Calgary
Age: 42
Posts: 23
This thread is starting to lean towards the politics forum but thought I'd add my 2 cents.... and I had to think for a bit before I decided to add my voice - politics is like religion - great way to ruin friendships and cause ridiculous arguments.

My take: That entire section of the world (that includes iran, iraq, afghanistan, lebanon, saudi arabia, jordan ,isreal, palestine and most of africa - and yeah south america - and as far as I'm concerned NONE of them deserve a capital letter) is crazy. The insanity and turmoil in that part of the world isn't ever going to be resolved. When you're dealing with religious fanatics, power-hungry dictators or just your run of the mill despots - they will never EVER see reason and will continue to perpetrate the atrocities that that area of the world has become known for. There is NO solution. "Nuking" one country isn't a solution - as tempting as it can be at times. Killing millions of innocents isn't a way to garner peace. It's the same as everywhere in the world - often the most vocal and visible people are the minority. There are millions of innocent people in all the countries I mentioned above that just want to live their lives. But you have those violent fanatical idiots that seem to always take control in that area of the world that screws up any chance of peace - not only for their own people but virtually every country in the world.

I 100% support our troops (Canadian or US) but I am also 150% percent their involvement over there. It will NEVER solve anything, it's costing billions of dollars and countless lives (because even 1 is too many). To me there are only 2 things you can do.

1)start with 1 country - and basically round up absolutely everyone - go from 1 end to the other sweeping up everyone. Then all the fanatics (whether religious, money or power driven) - basically those in power that are causing all the shit - and kill them. period. Tell the country they have 1 more chance to do it right - if they don't join the rest of the world in the 21st century and try for peace then that's it - see option 2. Then repeat this for every single country that insists on ruling through fear and murder. Democracy may not be perfect but it's a hell of a lot better then most of the governments over there.

2)Wall up and segregate them completely. NO trade, NO travel - nothing. If you've seen the movie Doomsday you know where I'm going. Nothing gets in and NOTHING gets out. Let them sort themselves out without dragging the rest of the world into their mess. They can't behave in a moral manner then leave them to their barbarism.

I am SO sick and tired of that entire part of the world - the zealots and fanatics that insist on pushing their beliefs on everyone (and yeah I'm aware of the double standard) and the out and out Barbarism that is practiced by nations around the world - usually in the name of religion - it just nauseates me!

Ok - rant over. Now more hot military girls please!!!
Jan 23, 2009 at 11:24 am 
LayLow
LayLow
Edmonton
Age: 31
Posts: 1012
"exterminate the Israel and clean the area of them".... Does saying that make you any better then what Israel is trying to achieve? If you don't see the double standard in what you've just said then there's no debating the issue with you. For a Venus project supporter you don't seem to have an issue assigning power.
Jan 23, 2009 at 11:24 am 
Tender
Tender
Edmonton
Age: 31
Posts: 736
You don't need to have credential nor authority to recognize that killing of children is bad. All I am saying is that this merciless killing and oppression needs to stop. And Israel is simply getting more oppressive and more aggressive as years go by. How do you stop such aggressor?

We are talking about innocent people and children who are being slaughtered. This needs to stop so the world can move forward.
Jan 23, 2009 at 11:32 am 
Caltaz
Caltaz
USA
Age: 44
Posts: 1208
I will assume by the chosen words that unless opinions coincide with the anti-Israel side, there is no reason to give them voice.
Jan 23, 2009 at 11:38 am 
Wannabe
Wannabe
Antarctica
Age: 27
Posts: 312
Talshadar brings up some great points. I believe that use of word "nuke" was not meant the way internet made it sound. It is used to show that you disagree with actions of that country entirely to the point that you are open to anything just to stop these actions. I think the thread focuses too much on the use of a word rather than what's behind it and what it's meant to perpetrate.

Let's not forget that there are Christians among Palestinians as well and they fight the Israeli army just as do Muslims. All Palestinians want is to be able to return to their homes and see their children grow up, not die ripped apart by Israeli bombs.
Jan 23, 2009 at 11:38 am 
Talshadar
Talshadar
Calgary
Age: 42
Posts: 23
I assume you mean "nuke" and not "nude" (though now I can't stop thinking of nude .. mmmmm) and I agree. I use the word "nuke" quite often in exactly the manner you state. As a way to show that I'm SO disgusted with the topic that that type of extreme behavior is almost acceptable to make it stop.
Jan 23, 2009 at 11:43 am 
Wannabe
Wannabe
Antarctica
Age: 27
Posts: 312
Mistype, thanks for pointing it out. Yeah, I did mean "nuke" not "nude", I get all forms of mixed up thoughts when I'm on this site
Jan 23, 2009 at 11:46 am 
Talshadar
Talshadar
Calgary
Age: 42
Posts: 23
me too ... not that I mind lol
Jan 23, 2009 at 11:51 am 
iggogg
iggogg
Bohstohn
Age: 45
Posts: 250
Can we get another thread for the arguing,this is supposed to be about the sexy pics.GODDAMIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jan 23, 2009 at 11:52 am 
Sherry
Sherry
Sin City
Age: 33
Posts: 39
over and over I hear the phrase_ _ innocent women and children_ _ palestine does not own the market on innocent women and children. any country having nuclear weapons pointed at it contains innocent women and children. innocent women and children die in every war, every conflict, every so called police action. I'm not proud of some of the things my country has done, the things men have done, that cost the lives of innocent women and children. nuclear weapons won't solve the problem. just more innocent women and children dying. and on a side note, why wasn't I surprised that this would bring Lila and Tender, the karl rove and james carville of angie's cabinet, into the thread? let's find solutions that will STOP innocent women and children from dying because of the pride of men, and put the bigotry aside
Jan 23, 2009 at 11:56 am 
LayLow
LayLow
Edmonton
Age: 31
Posts: 1012
Since there has been such a thing as Innocent women and children they have been killed. Military aggression isn't a scalpel its an executioner's ax. Occupying countries doesn't solidify a decrease in the death toll (Vietnam, Cambodia,Korea, Afghanistan).The best way to stop tyrants is not to become them ourselves
Jan 23, 2009 at 12:00 pm 
Tender
Tender
Edmonton
Age: 31
Posts: 736
Sherry wrote:
let's find solutions that will STOP innocent women and children from dying because of the pride of men, and put the bigotry aside


Don't you find it ironic that you were the only one who brought bigoted hatred to this thread? You are the one with personal attacks and name calling and you come here to preach about putting bigotry aside?

Just because people share love for humanity and peace, it doesn't make us Angie's cabinet. You are full of hate just as the people you advocate. It only proves that Angie was right.
Jan 23, 2009 at 12:10 pm 
fido_alive
fido_alive
Minneapolis, MN
Age: 40
Posts: 1939
Laylow's gonna get his butt kicked by politics again. I'm standing on the sideline this time. Politics scare me.
Jan 23, 2009 at 12:11 pm 
Melicious
Melicious
Los Angeles
Age: 41
Posts: 1731
I'm not taking sides on this one as I don't think America (or anyone for that matter) should get involved in the first place. This isn't our battle and there are people in the states that believe both ways.

The situation with Palenstine and Israel is simple believe it or not. It's a battle over real estate, backed by religious beliefs of what people believe SHOULD be theirs and using force (on both sides people) to get their point across. The fact that neither of these two countries can compromise (lately Israel is the big bad guy, in the past it was Palestine that was the big bad guy) and seperate the land equally leaves no other option than to let them kill each other off. It's sad that people are stuck in the middle and losing their lives over something that they have no control over, but this is a situation that needs to be resolved by them and not the world. Getting involved will only result in fueling the fires of both sides.

Really, how can you force two groups of people that have historically hated each other for hundreds of years to agree unless they want to. They both don't want to at this point. Like little kids pouting in the corner about "but he took it! I was playing with it and he took it!" "Well, you started it! That's why I hit you and took it away!" and people die because of the temper tantrums.

stupid. plain and simple. stupid.
Jan 23, 2009 at 12:18 pm 
Caltaz
Caltaz
USA
Age: 44
Posts: 1208
I must throw a few cents in here about personal attacks. Debate is health and will strengthen both views either by changing the mind of one or consolidating that view BUT when phrases are used like "Anyone who believes..." and then it is followed with derogatory jargon about that belief, I see this as a personal attack and not an open door for communication. It closes that person and excludes their opinion.
Jan 23, 2009 at 12:18 pm 
LayLow
LayLow
Edmonton
Age: 31
Posts: 1012
lol Fido, again? I guess if you count being barraged by a group of people who hold no accountability because their snap judgments are never put into action losing....then yes, I lose quite often
Jan 23, 2009 at 12:18 pm 
Caltaz
Caltaz
USA
Age: 44
Posts: 1208
Mel is here now ... remember, folks, Mel is mean!!!
Jan 23, 2009 at 12:19 pm 
Sherry
Sherry
Sin City
Age: 33
Posts: 39
no, i don't. i pointed out the fact that your friend wants to nuke Israel and has made other anti-semitic comments in other threads. i have no regret in pointing out her attacks on them. I could be her lapdog and march in step behind her, but my conscience begs to differ. free speech applies to her and also applies to me. i support the rights of americans, canadians, israelis, palestinians_ _ _the world, in fact, to be free and express their freedoms. but I also support the notion and idea that we can also disagree when someone casually and callously suggests nuking another country. killing innocent women and children in any country does not and will not solve the problem
Jan 23, 2009 at 12:21 pm 
Melicious
Melicious
Los Angeles
Age: 41
Posts: 1731
Caltaz wrote:
Mel is here now ... remember, folks, Mel is mean!!!
Yeah! Watch it or I'll go all medieval on your asses!

Send me in to Israel and Palestine....I'll scare the aggression out of those fuckahs!
Jan 23, 2009 at 12:22 pm 
Melicious
Melicious
Los Angeles
Age: 41
Posts: 1731
Oh! And to get back to the original subject, those girls are HOT!
Jan 23, 2009 at 12:24 pm 
Wannabe
Wannabe
Antarctica
Age: 27
Posts: 312
Melicious wrote:
in the past it was Palestine that was the big bad guy


Not quite. There were no fights in the area for 400 years. Then Israel entered and started stealing land and oppressing Palestinians. The oppressed then partizaned to fight back.

It is similar scenario to white men entering North America and stealing land from Indians, raping their women, killing their children. The aggressor referred to the natives as savage redskins who would scalp white men, but really - why were they doing that? Simple - because they had their own land stolen from them and their own kin murdered. Of course if you push someone in the corner and abuse them so much they will get to the point where they have nothing else to lose and must fight back or die.
Jan 23, 2009 at 12:28 pm 
LayLow
LayLow
Edmonton
Age: 31
Posts: 1012
Mel, thanks for rationally thinking it through before presenting your opinion... as always
Jan 23, 2009 at 12:29 pm 
Sherry
Sherry
Sin City
Age: 33
Posts: 39
so the use of nuclear weapons is your move toward humanity and peace? give me time to take a tylenol on that one. as far as who i advocate_ _ _ I am not a spokesperson for Israel or any other country. i speak out against anti-semitism because i know it is wrong. if some huckster came in here jabbering about killing muslims, i would also give him my 10 cents worth. the only people i advocate, as you put it, are the innocent women and children who get caught in the crossfire anywhere_ _ _ afghanistan, iraq, israel, palestine, somalia, darfur, haiti, bosnia_ _makes no difference to me. nuclear weapons solves nothing. it only creates more problems
Jan 23, 2009 at 12:31 pm 
Melicious
Melicious
Los Angeles
Age: 41
Posts: 1731
Wannabe wrote:
Melicious wrote:
in the past it was Palestine that was the big bad guy


Not quite. There were no fights in the area for 400 years. Then Israel entered and started stealing land and oppressing Palestinians. The oppressed then partizaned to fight back.

It is similar scenario to white men entering North America and stealing land from Indians, raping their women, killing their children. The aggressor referred to the natives as savage redskins who would scalp white men, but really - why were they doing that? Simple - because they had their own land stolen from them and their own kin murdered. Of course if you push someone in the corner and abuse them so much they will get to the point where they have nothing else to lose and must fight back or die.
Agreed and I understand how the Palestinians would react that way, however it still doesn't mean that anyone else getting involved is going to make anything better for them. Nobody came to the Indians' rescue here in the Americas and it worked itself out eventually. Albeit not in the favor of the American Indians and I never said it was right what happened to them. However now they enjoy some of what the white man has brought to them and are more protected than if some others would have come in to take their land away. Just ask the Indian Casino owners here in California..lol. Those bastards are rich!!! The economy within the Indian bands is 200% better than America's right now.

It sucks...survival of the fittest. Not a good thing in most cases if you ask me, but what is and what should be are two different things. It still doesn't mean that America, Europe or anyone else should step in at this point and try to make a difference. The difference they make will more than likely not be a good one.
Jan 23, 2009 at 12:35 pm 
Tender
Tender
Edmonton
Age: 31
Posts: 736
Sherry, you have yet to say anything that would make any sense, so I'm just gonna ignore you until you grow up. You don't even know what you're saying, you contradict yourself with each new post and it's embarrassing. But really, if you don't like killing of innocent children and women, then you should voice against Israel, because they are the ones doing that. I voice myself against them and am not afraid to stick with my beliefs.

If Caltaz or anyone else started a thread showing utmost disregard to these killings, I would agree with them. Similarly, if Angie started a thread praising Israel - I would strongly disagree with her. It has nothing to do with being part of her cabinet. It has everything to do with being educated, familiar with history and on the side of humanity. I feel strongly about actions of oppressors and as such you won't see a simple shift in my beliefs just because someone else thinks differently. This is a type of quality you would have no idea about, though.
Jan 23, 2009 at 12:44 pm 
LayLow
LayLow
Edmonton
Age: 31
Posts: 1012
Tender, my issue isn't with your views. Your opinions are your own and who am I to judge them or your character because of them? I do disagree with your resolution to some of the issues, few things in this world are simply black and white.
Jan 23, 2009 at 12:55 pm 
Wannabe
Wannabe
Antarctica
Age: 27
Posts: 312
Melicious wrote:
However now they enjoy some of what the white man has brought to them and are more protected than if some others would have come in to take their land away. Just ask the Indian Casino owners here in California..lol. Those bastards are rich!!! The economy within the Indian bands is 200% better than America's right now.


Mel, you're a nice girl, but you got to admit that this is a weak argument. Indians lived on these lands for thousands of years in happiness and prosperity (in their own terms), living very closely to the Earth and respecting it. I'm sure that despite of all the advantages that they're being presented with by their occupants, they would be much happier if their land was left for them to develop into whatever they'd wish it developed into.

It is as if a woman who's beautiful was kidnapped from her family she loves and given to a rich sheik in the Middle East. She'd live in a castle and have anything she could wish for, only she wouldn't be able to develop her own life in a surrounding of her choice - she'd have to play by somebody else's rules.

Yes, Indians are given the rights in North America, but they are still restricted to live the way their occupants say. They are forced to live the way western society lives, not the way they would have lived had their lands not been stolen from them. Do you see where I'm coming from?
Jan 23, 2009 at 1:04 pm 
Tender
Tender
Edmonton
Age: 31
Posts: 736
LayLow, you are the weirdest guy in the world, you know that? Your views and opinions on many important aspects are weird - such as you're an Obama worshipper and you speak for guns, but at the same time you're really nice. You just don't add up. What's the deal with you, dude
Jan 23, 2009 at 1:12 pm 
Sherry
Sherry
Sin City
Age: 33
Posts: 39
Tender, you're doing the usual. When Scooter disagreed with you, you resorted to phrases such as _ _ _ grow up_ _ _you're contradicting yourself_ _ _ the posts are embarrasing blah blah blah. I said that if someone were bashing muslims I would speak out against that person also. and if you would adjust your bifocals I said that the killing of innocent women and children in afghanistan, israel, iraq, somalia, darfur, bosnia, or any other country, is wrong. I don't hold america or any other country blameless. doesn't matter to me who is doing the killing. it's wrong. but she didn't say nuke america, nuke africa, nuke russia. she said nuke Israel. nukes are wrong. period. i want palestinians, israelis, americans, children of all countries, to be able to enjoy just that_ _ _a childhood
Jan 23, 2009 at 1:14 pm 
fido_alive
fido_alive
Minneapolis, MN
Age: 40
Posts: 1939
Tender wrote:
LayLow, you are the weirdest guy in the world, you know that? Your views and opinions on many important aspects are weird - such as you're an Obama worshipper and you speak for guns, but at the same time you're really nice. You just don't add up. What's the deal with you, dude


See Laylow, now you getting picked on 'cause you can't add. It's tough being you.

I agree with Sherry, these girls should just be able to do what hot girls do, and flaunt their hot-ness. They shouldn't have to shoot people.
Jan 23, 2009 at 1:15 pm 
Melicious
Melicious
Los Angeles
Age: 41
Posts: 1731
Wannabe wrote:
Melicious wrote:
However now they enjoy some of what the white man has brought to them and are more protected than if some others would have come in to take their land away. Just ask the Indian Casino owners here in California..lol. Those bastards are rich!!! The economy within the Indian bands is 200% better than America's right now.


Mel, you're a nice girl, but you got to admit that this is a weak argument. Indians lived on these lands for thousands of years in happiness and prosperity (in their own terms), living very closely to the Earth and respecting it. I'm sure that despite of all the advantages that they're being presented with by their occupants, they would be much happier if their land was left for them to develop into whatever they'd wish it developed into.

It is as if a woman who's beautiful was kidnapped from her family she loves and given to a rich sheik in the Middle East. She'd live in a castle and have anything she could wish for, only she wouldn't be able to develop her own life in a surrounding of her choice - she'd have to play by somebody else's rules.

Yes, Indians are given the rights in North America, but they are still restricted to live the way their occupants say. They are forced to live the way western society lives, not the way they would have lived had their lands not been stolen from them. Do you see where I'm coming from?
Considering their options, you have to admit that they at least ended up with SOMETHING. You see, if it wasn't the Americans that had taken the land, it would have been someone else. That someone else could have decided to just eradicate them completely and take EVERYTHING. How little that they ended up with and the process by which Americans at that time took their land disgusts me. But I also know that their land being taken away would have been inevitable. Like I said. What SHOULD BE and what IS are two different things. Logically speaking, they had a ton of land that was valuable. They were a small culture compared to others in the world that had very little to defend themselves. Someone would have taken it. A good analogy would be if you sit me naked in the middle of skid row with a box full of money, hypo needles, heroine and booze with no gun or way to protect myself. What do you think would happen? SHOULD I be beaten, raped and robbed? No, I shouldn't, but WILL I? At least with the scenario that played out, they ended up with something and some kind of protection in the end. In other words, it could have been worse.

Do I agree with human tendencies like this? NO, if it were up to me everyone would spit rainbows, shit ice cream and eat fluffernutters in peace for all existence. But does this mean it's viable?

Another example of not getting involved. Ireland and the British. It didn't end up in the favor of Ireland, but they have learned to live with what land they were able to keep. Are they happy about it? Hell no, but do you think that things would have ended up better if someone else had stepped in? You can't be moderator. Like the two little kids pouting in the corner. They'll agree to disagree to appease the teacher, but the minute that teacher leaves the room they'll start fighting again. Only now, the two kids also hate the teacher for punishing them and not just each other anymore.
Jan 23, 2009 at 1:15 pm 
LayLow
LayLow
Edmonton
Age: 31
Posts: 1012
lol I own a gun yes, is getting rid of guns plausible? no =( would I have voted for Biden and Obama over Mccain and Palin the moron? of course, does that make me a worshiper? I'd hope not.. if (possibly when) he drops the ball I won't fail to notice. Thanks, for calling me a nice guy...
Jan 23, 2009 at 1:19 pm 
Tender
Tender
Edmonton
Age: 31
Posts: 736
No no no. You wouldn't just vote for Obama because the other option was shittier. You thought Obama was the shit. Maybe you don't think that anymore, in which case kudos to you for opening up your eyes, but at the time you were all over his rims. Glad to hear you were able to see past the veil.
Jan 23, 2009 at 1:23 pm 
fido_alive
fido_alive
Minneapolis, MN
Age: 40
Posts: 1939
Damn it Laylow, get off his rim, he's trying to give a speech!
Jan 23, 2009 at 1:27 pm 
  • Email This Thread To Your Friend
    Digg This Thread
    Stumble Upon This Thread
    Reddit This Thread
    Add This Thread to Facebook
    Mixx This Thread
    Add this to your blog:
    Add this code to a forum:
  • Subscribe
    via RSS
    Subscribe via RSS